Recently,
our office appeared in front of the New Hampshire Supreme Court to argue on the
issue of post-judgment interest. The Case was titled “Estate of Jack Bergquist”
and the brief we prepared can be read here. In
that case, the creditor obtained a Judgment on the Defendant, and periodic
payments were made. Over the course of the next eight (8) years, the Defendant
made all of his regularly scheduled payments until his death. Unfortunately, a
balance remained on the Judgment, and the creditor claimed not only the amount
of the Judgment minus any payments, but interest accrued since the date the
periodic payment order was made. The two main questions to be resolved were
whether a Plaintiff is required to request post-judgment interest as part of
the Judgment, and two, whether the order of periodic payments cuts off the
interest from being accrued.
However,
while the decision is up to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, it outlines an
issue many of our clients face. If a Judgment is obtained, and the Defendant
takes a year to pay, how do I get the full benefit of those funds? Well, in the
first instance, interest is awarded on Judgments from the date suit is filed
until the Judgment is rendered under New Hampshire law. This is accounted for
at the conclusion of litigation by requesting costs and interest be added. In
all cases, it is important to assert your rights and not leave it up to the
Court to assert them for you.
The
second problem is the one we first addressed: why should the Defendant get the
benefit of not paying me, when the interest I could have earned is lost. This
is a problem many Judgment creditors face, and it is important to talk to an
attorney to find out how to assert your rights in the most complete and
efficient way possible. This way any judgment creditor can be proactive in asserting
their complete rights.
If you
need assistance with the legal process, or enforcement of Judgments, please
feel free to contact the
experienced lawyers of Parnell & McKay.
No comments:
Post a Comment