Our
firm has taken on a wide variety of various landlord/tenant cases, from
statutory violations, to personal injuries from premises liability cases, to
preventing a person from unlawfully being ejected from their home, among
others. We often find that a lot of tenants are completely unaware of many of
the basic rules that apply to them as renters of real estate.
One
of the biggest is the law as it relates to security deposits. Often, a landlord
decides to keep a security deposit unjustifiably, fails to follow the statutory
procedure, and ends up unlawfully taking the security deposit of a tenant. RSA 540-A:7
governs the return of security deposit to tenants. Generally, the security
deposit must be returned within thirty (30) days from the termination of the
tenancy. However, some landlords just decide to keep it and “dare” the tenants
to do something about it. This is most unfortunate, but as a tenant this
creates a very specific cause of action against the landlord.
First,
if the landlord does not return the security deposit, they must comply with RSA
540-A:7. Specifically, they must “provide
the tenant with a written,
itemized list of any damages for which the landlord claims the tenant is
liable, which shall indicate with particularity the nature of any repair
necessary to correct any damage and satisfactory evidence that repair necessary
to correct these damages has been or will be completed. Satisfactory evidence
may include, but not be limited to, receipts for purchased repair materials and
labor estimates, bills or invoices indicating the actual or estimated cost
thereof.” This
essentially boils down to forcing the landlord to prove, specifically, why they
are entitled to keep the security deposit. Often times, the landlord fails to
do this and it creates a cause of action for the tenant against the landlord.
This failure to comply with RSA
540-A can entitle the tenant to costs, attorney’s fees, and up to twice the sum
of the security deposit in Court. Thus, if your security deposit was $1,000,
you would be entitled to obtain $2,000 from the Court for the 540-A violations.
It is also likely that a landlord may have violated other provisions of RSA
540-A if he violated the security deposit rules, which may entitle a tenant to
additional damages and fees and costs.
If you find yourself in a situation
as a tenant where you are faced with an overreaching landlord, please contact us today. We have
handled many cases for both tenants and landlords, and have over 20 years
combined experience in landlord tenant law.
No comments:
Post a Comment